Media PageWELCOME to Gravimotion's Website! |
Book titleNeither physics nor fiction
Read all about Gravimotion! Available now, a click away on your right. The book can also be downloaded through internet. Book PublisherAmerican Book PublishingOn February 2 2010, the publisher gave noticed to the author that they've "gone out of print on" his title, for lack of sales. The author was informed that that decision was mainly due to his own lack of effort to market his book. AuthorFor your information the author is not a physicist! Yet he studied physics and still does.The author is not a writer either! Yet to make sure he expresses his ideas correctly he uses dictionaries a lot. And the author is no doubt a worthless marketing man! As such the author can only humbly witness with maze the constant increase of traffic on his websites! The only thing the author has to his advantage is a conviction: he firmly thinks motion is real. Unfortunately he is also convinced that physics tramples over the reality of motion. The bad news is that physicists do not agree on that later point! Physicists claim the author is ignorant; some claim motion is real in physics too; other simply say they do not believe his interpretation of Nature! And these claims made him wonder more than once! The author favorite aphorism is from Leonardo da Vinci: "Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication". Gravimotion in the professional pressGravimotion's idea cannot be submitted to journals of physics as not worthy of physics own self-image. As an example see Wikipedia controversy below.Professional physicists simply disregard non-mathematical theories. In the professional press anything, which doesn't stick to main stream physics, yet claims to represent Nature, is stray ideas and disregarded. Gravimotion belongs to this category that is rejected by the media. Gravimotion on Internet"Gravimotion.info" website (this site) offers only an introduction to the Gravimotion interpretation of Nature.Gravimotion's site has nevertheless some success. A counter has been installed on the site on August 10 2007. Since this date thousands have visited the site. The visitors are from all over the English-speaking world. 50% of the visits come from the USA. Visits from major universities are not uncommon, even from other technical governmental organizations such as NASA and CERN. Gravimotion's websites experience more and more success. In Nov 2011 it registered an average of 230 visits / day, an increase of 83% over Nov 2010.
History of GravimotionIn January 2001, the idea of Gravimotion appeared in the mind of the author while flying from San Francisco to Paris.The first website opened by the author was: www.thetruthofthematteris.com, now dropped and apparently used by someone else. Web.archive.org used to keep track of old websites, but no more. So that history is lost. Gravimotion controversy on WikipediaIn January 2007, the inventor of Gravimotion posted an article titled "Gravimotion" on Wikipedia.The content of the article was a very short introduction to the idea of gravimotion. In May of 2007, Wikipedia's crew discovered it and immediately asked for deletion. The inventor tried to fight the deletion, to no avail. The gravimotion idea, not in line with conventional physics, and as such not endorsed by a single physicist so far, has been judged not worthy of Wikipedia. And that assertion was the less humiliating that was used by the judges! The inventor ended up agreeing that gravimotion is incompatible with physics theories and under pressure had to delete the article himself. The whole debate is disclosed at: Gravimotion Wikipedia deletion debate. Since Wikipedia articles may be modified at any time, and some of those who intervened might want to erase their own writing, the inventor kept a cache (a copy dated Aug 27 2007) of the debate. There is a good side to that controversy though! The inventor is now prepared! The inventor learned a lesson; face to face with gravimotion, some among the physicists drop their alleged objectivity and turn themselves into implacable judges. The inventor rebuttal is a question:
How would those physicists, who claim that their irrational conclusions don't make sense, could endorse Gravimotion that does make sense?
Incredible but true, a physicist at CERN even asked the author that question: But what do you mean by "it makes sense"? |
